Section 3.    Evaluation Criteria

 

This section, read in conjunction with Section 1, Instructions to Bidders and Section 2, Bid Data Sheet, contains all the factors, methods and criteria that the Procuring Entity shall use to evaluate a proposal and determine the best evaluated proposal. No other factors, methods or criteria shall be used.

1. Evaluation Methodology

The methodology for the evaluation of proposals will be _________________________________________________________________________.

2. Technical Evaluation Criteria

The technical criteria and maximum number of points to be given under each are:

 

Criteria

Maximum Points

(a)

Specific experience of the Bidder related to the assignment

[5-10]

(b)

Adequacy of the proposed work plan and methodology

[20-50]

(c)

Qualifications and competence of the key personnel for the Assignment

[30-60]

(d)

Suitability of the transfer of knowledge programme

[0-10]

(e)

Participation of nationals (as reflected by nationals among key staff)

[0-10]

 

Total Points

100

 

The number of points to be given under each evaluation sub-criteria for (c) qualifications of staff are:

 

Criteria

Maximum Points

(a)

General qualifications

[20-30]

(b)

Adequacy for the assignment

[50-60]

(c)

Experience in region and language

[10-20]

 

Total Points

100

The proposals proceeding to the financial evaluation shall be:

{For QCBS, Fixed Budget Selection and Least Cost Selection}

All proposals reaching the minimum technical score of: __________

{For QBS}

The proposal achieving the highest technical score only.

3. Financial Evaluation and Comparison of Proposals

Proposals will be compared using the following methodology to determine the best evaluated proposal:

{For QCBS only}

To determine financial scores for each proposal, the lowest priced proposal shall be given a financial score of 100, and other proposals shall be given a score proportionate to this, by application of the following formula:

              Sf = 100 x Fm/F            in which:

              Sf       denotes the financial score of the proposal under consideration;

              Fm    is the price of the lowest price proposal that passed the technical evaluation;

              F       denotes the price of the proposal under consideration.

A total score (S) will be determined for each proposal, by combining its technical (St) and financial (Sf) scores using the following formula and weightings:

              S = (St x T%) + (Sf x P%)

The weights given to the scores of the Technical and Financial Proposals are:

              T = [70 - 90]

              P = [10 - 30]

Proposals will be ranked and the proposal achieving the highest total score will be recommended for contract award, subject to satisfactory negotiations.

{For QBS only}

The financial proposal will be reviewed in order to prepare for negotiations.

{For FBS only}

The maximum budget is: __________. Proposals exceeding this budget will be rejected.

The proposal with the highest technical score, which is within the budget, will be recommended for contract award, subject to satisfactory negotiations.

{For LCS only}

Proposals will be ranked. The lowest priced proposal will be recommended for contract award, subject to satisfactory negotiations.